GMP ADDRESS RAPE CAUTION CONCERNS

In a bid to dispel rumours and myths being circulated around via social media the GMP Chief Constable has issued the following statement to try and clear up the confusion over the current sentencing situation. 

Quote

 

The below message has been released by GMP Chief Constable Ian Hopkins in response to recent media coverage of cautions given for rape:

Chief Constable Ian Hopkins said: “Understandably given the coverage around individuals being cautioned for rape, the people of Greater Manchester must be concerned due to the nature of the offences.

“I would like to reassure the public that we have robust procedures and scrutiny in place to ensure that, on the rare occasion cautions are given for serious offences, it is in the interests of the victim and the wider public.

“A caution is a serious matter. It is recorded by police and may be cited in subsequent proceedings. Cautions for indictable offences can only be authorised by the Crown Prosecution Service, and only then when they have been reviewed by an officer of Superintendent rank or above.

“The Police and Crime Commissioner has a Quality Assurance Board that scrutinises rape cases that haven’t been prosecuted. Individual senior police officers and CPS representatives sit on this board.

“Of the 14 cases highlighted in the media, eight were referred to and authorised by the Crown Prosecution Service. There was one case where this didn’t happen but in that case the offender was 11-years-old and the victim just five so the senior officer made absolutely the right decision and this was made with the parents’ agreement.

“The remaining five, while reported initially as rape, once investigated were found to have insufficient evidence for a charge of rape. However, there was enough evidence to establish that a lesser offence had been committed.

“Three of the five cautions were then authorised by the CPS and two were authorised by police officers.

“In the 14 cases, which happened over a five year period, the majority of the offenders were children. Youth offending teams were consulted and the decision to caution was only made after proper consideration. In all cases the victims and their families were consulted.

“I hope this helps to clarify this situation and the public understand the complex nature of these types of offences and the very thorough and robust decision-making processes that we follow throughout.”